Implementation of Generative Learning Models with Probing Question Methods in Static Fluid Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v1i3.85Keywords:
Generative Learning Model, Probing Questions, Learning OutcomesAbstract
Learners who cannot connect the new knowledge received with previous knowledge will find it difficult to understand learning, causing low learning outcomes. The solution offered is to apply a generative learning model with the probing question method. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of applying a generative learning model with probing question method on the learning outcomes of students in Static Fluid material class XI SMAN 14 Padang. The type of research is Quasi Experimental. The study population was all students of class XI MIPA. Sampling using purposive sampling technique. The research sample is XI MIPA 4 class as an experimental class and XI MIPA 5 class as a control class. A written page in the shape of an objective serves as the tool. The findings revealed a substantial contrast between classes using PBL learning models with probing question techniques and classes using generative learning models with these techniques in terms of the learning outcomes of the students. When compared to the control class, the experimental class's average learning outcomes were 81, while it was 78.4. At a significant threshold of alpha = 0.05, it was determined that tcount = 8.704 and ttable = 1.995 based on the equality test of the two averages. If ttable< tcount, then H0 must be disregarded. The significance of tcount lies in the rejection of H0 and acceptance of H1, which demonstrate that the generative learning model with the probing question method has a beneficial impact on learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
A. Djamaluddin and Wardana, Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Sulawesi Selatan: CV. Kaffah Learning Center, 2019.
A. Munawaroh, I. Wilujeng, and Z. Hidayatullah, “Physics Learning Instruction Based on the Conceptual Change Model for Senior High Schools,” Proc. 6th Int. Semin. Sci. Educ. (ISSE 2020), vol. 541, no. Isse 2020, pp. 441–446, 2021, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210326.063.
A. Doyan, M. Taufik, and R. Anjani, “Pengaruh Pendekatan Multi Representasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Peserta Didik,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 4, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v4i1.99.
K. Najib, J. Siswanto, and J. Saefan, “Pengaruh Pendekatan Multirepresentasi Terhadap Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika,” J. Banua Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2020, doi: 10.20527/jbse.v1i1.5.
Syafryadin, I. N. Rahmawati, and R. Widiastuti, “Improving grade X students’ speaking achievement under round robin technique,” Int. J. an Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 74–82, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://artikel.ubl.ac.id/index.php/icel/article/view/197
Karto, Suhartono, Susetyo, Noermanzah, and I. Maisarah, “The differences ability in writing descriptive texts by using chain writing and conventional methods,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 2714–2719, 2019.
T. Tayeb, “Analisis dan Manfaat Model Pembelajaran,” J. Pendidik. Dasar Islam, vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 48–55, 2017.
Trianto, Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Presentasi Pustaka, 2011.
Z. Anzar, A. Arvyaty, B. Busnawir, and F. Fahinu, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 12 Kendari,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 43, 2019, doi: 10.36709/jpm.v10i1.5643.
A. Akmam, R. Hidayat, F. Mufit, N. Jalinus, and A. Amran, “Factor Analysis Affecting the Implementation of the Generative Learning Model with a Cognitive Conflict Strategy in the Computational Physics Course during the COVID-19 Pandemic Era,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2309, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012095.
Isrok’atun and A. Rosmala, Model-Model Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: Bumi Aksara, 2018.
A. Qonaah, H. Pujiastuti, and A. Fatah, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Matematis Siswa,” Edumatica J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2019, doi: 10.22437/edumatica.v9i1.6109.
P. S. Sari, “Proses Berpikir Peserta didik SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matemaika Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar KOLB,” Mathedunesa J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 57–64, 2017.
W. Murtafi’ah and T. Masfingatin, “Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Dengan Kemampuan Spatial Intellegent Tinggi Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri”.
Desmita, Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2009.
Akmam and H. Amir, “Pengaruh Pmbelajaran Generatif Berbasis Strategi Konflik Kognitif Terhadap Kompetensi Mahapeserta didik Dalam Matakuliah Algoritma dan Pemograman Komputer,” in Prosiding Semirata 2017 Bidang MIPA, Jambi, 2017.
E. Firmansyah, “Efektivitas pembelajaran generatif terhadap kemampuan matematisasi siswa di smp,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–65, 2017.
S. Lestari, A. Andinasari, and A. M. Retta, “Model Pembelajaran Generatif Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Peserta Didik,” IndoMath Indones. Math. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 44, 2020, doi: 10.30738/indomath.v3i1.6356.
S. Maryani and H. Sahidu, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif Dengan Metode PQ4R Melalui Scaffolding Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Peserta Didik,” vol. 6, no. 1, 2020.
N. Luh, P. Eka, D. B. Kt, N. Smara, and I. B. G. S. Abadi, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Generatif Berbasis Lingkungan Terhadap Kompetensi Pengetahuan IPA,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 201–208, 2018.
T. Siregar and M. Nensi, “Model Pembelajaran Generatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Pada Materi Ikatan Kimia,” vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020.
H. Markus, “Student teachers’ types of probing questions in inquiry-based mathematics teaching with and without GeoGebra,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 973–987, 2017.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Tarsito, 2013.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
P. Suparno, Metodologi Pembelajaran Fisika Konstruktivistik & Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2013.
S. M. Wechsler et al., “Creative and critical thinking : Independent or overlapping components?,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 27, pp. 114–122, 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Elvira Hendini Hendini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Physics Learning and Education is licensed under a 