Needs Analysis : Development Of Physics Lkpd Based On Problem Based Learning To Facilitate Critical Thinking Skills Of Senior High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v2i1.79Keywords:
Problem Based Learning, Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik, Critical Thingking SkillsAbstract
The 21st century requires critical thinking skills. Physics learning in class XI has not been well implemented due to the lack of critical thinking skills in students. the lack of critical thinking skills in students, to overcome the problems of researchers using the PBL model which aims as follows: 1) testing the use of LKPD based on PBL to improve critical thinking skills to solve problems. Researchers used quantitative research assisted by observation and interviews. The population used was all 11th grade high school students. The research obtained the following findings as follows: 1) students' critical thinking skills are low when solving physics difficulties using LKPD and PBL learning model. Physics difficulties by using LKPD and PBL learning model; 2) the learning method in the teaching materials is less able to stimulate critical thinking skills. learning methods on teaching materials are less able to stimulate critical thinking skills in solving problems; 3) educators need media solving problems; 3) educators need learning media in the form of LKPD as an alternative for students in mastering critical thinking skills. as an alternative for students in mastering the ability to think critically in solving problems; 3) educators need learning media in the form of LKPD as an alternative to problem solving
Downloads
References
R. Julian etc, “Analisis Kebutuhan E-LKPD Untuk Menstimulasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dalam Memecahkan Masalah,” Proceeding 1st Steeem, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 238–243, 2019.
M. Z. Arifin and A. Setiawan, “Strategi Belajar Dan Mengajar Guru Pada Abad 21,” Indones. J. Instr. Technol., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 37–46, 2020.
M. Nisaul, “PJBL meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis,” vol. VI, no. 2, p. 56, 2013.
T. Y. E. Siswono, “Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Dalam Memecahkan,” J. Ilmu Pendidik., no. September, pp. 1–14, 2006.
N. Widoarti and S. Suparman, “Analisis Kebutuhan LKPD Penunjang Model PBL untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2021, doi: 10.37729/jipm.v3i1.1039.
B. P. Syafina and Suparman, “Designing student worksheets to improve critical thinking ability based on problem based learning,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1194–1199, 2019.
H. Hendriana, T. Johanto, and U. Sumarmo, “The role of problem-based learning to improve students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and self confidence,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 291–299, 2018, doi: 10.22342/jme.9.2.5394.291-300.
Sarjono, “MAN Pemalang 343,” vol. 7, pp. 343–353, 2017.
E. Setyaningsih, “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Medan Magnet Menggunakan Three Tier Test pada Siswa Kelas XII SMA di Jember,” Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Fis. 2018, vol. 3, no. 2015, pp. 167–172, 2018.
V. Reza et al., No Analisis struktural kovarians pada indikator yang berhubungan dengan kesehatan di antara para lansia di rumah, dengan fokus pada perasaan subjektif tentang kesehatan.Title, vol. 7, no. 2. 2020. [Online]
U. Toharudin, “Critical thinking and problem solving skills: How these skills are needed in educational psychology?,” Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 2004–2007, 2017, doi: 10.21275/ART20171836.
Y. Haryadi, D. Meirawan, and A. Rahadi, Pemberdayaan komite sekolah. Jakarta, 2006.
J. T. Pelawi, Idris, and M. F. Is, “Undang Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Pernikahan Dini (di Bawah Umur),” J. Educ. Dev., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 562–566, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/2792
M. Ali, “Teknik Analisis Kuantitatif,” Makal. Tek. Anal. II, pp. 1–7, 2006, [Online]. Available: http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132232818/pendidikan/Analisis+Kuantitatif.pdf
C. Validity, “Educational and Psychological Measurement,” 1980, doi: 10.1177/001316448004000419.
R. Indriani, F. Mufit, R. Hidayat, and S. Y. Sari, “Analysis of Students ’ Attitudes and Difficulties in Studying Computational Physics,” vol. 10, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.20527/bipf.v10i1.12408.
Y. H. Ridwan, M. Zuhdi, K. Kosim, and H. Sahidu, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Model Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Fisika Peserta Didik,” ORBITA J. Kajian, Inov. dan Apl. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 103, 2021, doi: 10.31764/orbita.v7i1.3832.
L. R. Aiken, “Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings, Educational and Psychological Measurument,” J. Artic. Reports - Res. Numer. Data, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 1985.
H. Retnawati, Heri Retnawati 9 786021 547984. 2016.
Kemdikbud, “Permendikbud nomor Nomor 37 Tahun 2018 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 Tentang Kompetensi Inti Dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran Pada Kurikulum 2013 Pada Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pendidikan Menengah,” JDIH Kemendikbud, vol. 2025, pp. 1–527, 2018.
Kemendikbud, “Materi Pelatihan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Tahun 2014,” Badan Pengemb. Sumber Daya Mns. Pendidik. dan Kebud. dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidik., p. 197, 2014.
I. Munawaroh, “Pembelajaran 2 Karakter Peserta Didik,” Modul Belajar Mandiri, pp. 45–64, 2021.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nopi Oktaviya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Physics Learning and Education is licensed under a 