A Systematic Review of Misconceptions in Particle Dynamics: Identification, Causes, and Remediation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v4i2.345Keywords:
Misconception, Particle Dynamics, Newton’s Laws, Systematic Review, VOSviewer, PRISMAAbstract
Particle dynamics is a foundational branch of physics, yet students frequently struggle with abstract concepts, leading to persistent misconceptions that hinder scientific reasoning. This study aims to analyze the specific concepts prone to misconceptions in particle dynamics, identify their primary causes, and evaluate the effectiveness of various remediation strategies to improve conceptual understanding. This research employed a descriptive quantitative design using the Systematic Review method following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A total of 20 scientific articles published between 2020 and 2025, indexed in national and international databases, were analyzed. The study integrated a bibliometric approach using VOSviewer software to visualize research trends and keyword networks, ensuring a robust and objective synthesis of the current literature. The findings indicate that misconceptions are most prevalent in Newton’s Laws (45%), followed by the Law of Conservation of Momentum (35%), and force and net force (30%). The primary cause of these errors is students' internal prior conceptions (65%), often derived from intuitive daily experiences that conflict with scientific principles. Effective remediation strategies identified include active learning models such as guided inquiry, generative learning, and cognitive conflict approaches. Furthermore, the integration of interactive simulations like PhET and E-LKPD significantly enhanced the remediation process by providing essential visual scaffolding. Misconceptions in particle dynamics remain a major challenge, predominantly rooted in intuitive reasoning regarding force and motion. Successful remediation requires pedagogical shifts toward active student involvement and the use of technology-based visualizations to facilitate conceptual change. These results provide a vital scientific reference for educators to design targeted interventions and for curriculum developers to address conceptual gaps early in physics education.
Downloads
References
Alabi, O., & Bukola, T. (2023). Introduction to Descriptive statistics. In Recent Advances in Biostatistics. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1002475
Aldahmash, A. H., & Alshaya, F. S. (2012). Secondary School Students’ Alternative Conceptions about Genetics. In Excellence Research Center of Science and Mathematics Education, King Saud Uni-versity (Vol. 16, Number 1). http://ejse.southwestern.edu
Amrullah, L. A., Handrianto, H., & Busyairi, A. (2024). Literature Review: Misconception Analysis of Static Fluid Material in High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika Indonesia, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppfi.v6i2.629
Astalini, Darmaji, Kurniawan, D. A., Oktavia, S. W., Triani, E., & Azzahra, M. Z. (2023). The Exploration of Character Values in Physics Learning on Momentum, Impulse, and Collision Materials. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i2.52381
Ayu Dewi Setiawati, G., Bagus Ari Arjaya, I., & Wayan Ekayanti, N. (2014). IDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI DALAM MATERI FOTOSINTESIS DAN RESPIRASI TUMBUHAN PADA SISWA KELAS IX SMP DI KOTA DENPASAR. Jurnal Bakti Saraswati, 03(02).
Comillo, R. B., & Mistades, V. M. (2025). IMPACT OF BRAIN-BASED TEACHING ON THE CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF NEWTON’S LAWS OF MOTION. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(2), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v14i2.23120
Dwi, I. V., & Rahayu, Y. S. (n.d.). Penerapan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) untuk Mengatasi Miskonsepsi PENERAPAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) UNTUK MENGATASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA SMP PADA MATERI FOTOSINTESIS.
Gea, W. O. S. (2020). Identifikasi Dan Remediasi Miskonsepsi Fisika Peserta Didik Dengan Menggunakan Model Problem Based Learning (Pbl) Pada Materi ….
Guerra-Reyes, F., Guerra-Dávila, E., Naranjo-Toro, M., Basantes-Andrade, A., & Guevara-Betancourt, S. (2024a). Misconceptions in the Learning of Natural Sciences: A Systematic Review. In Education Sciences (Vol. 14, Number 5). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050497
Guerra-Reyes, F., Guerra-Dávila, E., Naranjo-Toro, M., Basantes-Andrade, A., & Guevara-Betancourt, S. (2024b). Misconceptions in the Learning of Natural Sciences: A Systematic Review. In Education Sciences (Vol. 14, Number 5). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050497
Hadi, S., & Palupi, M. (2020). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW: META SINTESIS UNTUK RISET PERILAKU ORGANISASIONAL. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340610756
Indriyani, R., & Mufit, F. (2023). Interactive Multimedia Design Based on Cognitive Conflict Using Smartphone in Mechanical Wave Characteristics. EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.59052/edufisika.v8i1.24038
Ji, X., Liu, Y., Liu, Y. S., Zhang, J. H., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Large-momentum effective theory. Reviews of Modern Physics, 93(3). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.035005
Juandi, D. (2021). Heterogeneity of problem-based learning outcomes for improving mathematical competence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1722(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012108
Kadir Masalesi, A. (2022a). Resource Identification and Level of Understanding of Particle Dynamics Concepts. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.48
Kadir Masalesi, A. (2022b). Resource Identification and Level of Understanding of Particle Dynamics Concepts. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 1(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v1i2.48
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228756057
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. M. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302924724
Kusuma, W., & Dwi Sundari, P. (2024). Pillar of Physics Education (Vol. 45, Number 1).
Kyeremeh, S., Adu-Boahen, K., & Obeng Addai, M. (2023). Economic evaluation of groundwater resource in the Effutu Municipality: An application of the Gisser-Sanchez effect. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16398
Lutfiana, S., Fauzi, A., & Wahyuningsih, D. (2021). Remediasi Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Model Pembelajaran VAK untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa. Jurnal.Uns.Ac.Id, 11, 43–47.
Majidy, S. (2025a). Addressing misconceptions in university physics: A review and experiences from quantum physics educators. http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20923
Majidy, S. (2025b). Addressing misconceptions in university physics: A review and experiences from quantum physics educators. http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20923
Mohamed, R., Ghazali, M., & Samsudin, M. A. (2020). A Systematic Review on Mathematical Language Learning Using PRISMA in Scopus Database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8300
Murni, & D. (2013). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa pada Konsep Substansi Genetika Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI).
Nafis, M., Budiharti, R., & Fauzi, A. (2021). REMEDIASI PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA DENGAN MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) UNTUK MENCAPAI KETUNTASAN BELAJAR SISWA PADA ASPEK KOGNITIF MATERI GERAK LURUS KELAS X MIPA 2 SMA NEGERI 2 BOYOLALI. Jurnal Sains Edukatika Indonesia (JSEI), 3(1), 33–40.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. In BMJ (Vol. 372). BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pahlawan, R. (2021). Developing an Interactive Digital Handout for Momentum and Impulse Material Physics in High Schools Syarifuddin. In Journal of Education Technology (Vol. 3, Number 2).
Perry, A., & Hammond, N. (2002). Systematic reviews: The experiences of a PhD student HOW DOES A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW DIFFER FROM A TRADITIONAL LITERATURE REVIEW? In Psychology Learning and Teaching (Vol. 2, Number 1). www.cochrane.org
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (n.d.). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change*.
Prasetya, M., Ramadhan, F., Alatas, F., Fisika, P., Hidayatullah, S., & Selatan, T. (2024). Studi Literatur Terkait Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA Pada Materi Kalor: Implikasi Untuk Pengajaran Efektif. Seminar Nasioanl FITK UIN Jakarta, 1(1).
Rahmadani, U., Sundari, P. D., Hidayati, H., & Dewi, W. S. (2023a). Systematic Review of Misconceptions in Kinematics: Identification, Causes, and Remediation. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 1274–1283. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4956
Rahmadani, U., Sundari, P. D., Hidayati, H., & Dewi, W. S. (2023b). Systematic Review of Misconceptions in Kinematics: Identification, Causes, and Remediation. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 1274–1283. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4956
Sadia. (2004). Efektivitas Model Konflik Kognitif dan Model Siklus Belajar untuk Memperbaiki Miskonsepsi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Fisika.
Sudirman. (2014). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Pewarisan Sifat di Kelas IX SMP Negeri 36 Batam.
Suparno, & P. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika.
Suwasono, P., Supriyono Koes, H., Nugroho Adi, P., & Saniso, E. (2025). A Significant Reducing Misconception on Newton’s Law Under Purposive Scaffolding and Problem-Based Misconception Supported Modeling Instruction. Open Education Studies, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2025-0091
Thompson, F., & Logue, S. (2006). An exploration of common student misconceptions in science. International Education Journal, 7(4), 553–559. http://iej.com.au
(Ungvarsky. (2017). Systematic review. Dalam Salem Press Encyclopedia. 133.
Unsal, A. A., & Aydogdu, C. (2025). Technological Tools Used in Misconceptions Studies in Physics Education: A Systematic Review. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 11(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.814
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Wafiyah, N. (2012). IDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI SISWA DAN FAKTOR- FAKTOR PENYEBAB PADA MATERI PERMUTASI DAN KOMBINASI DI SMA NEGERI 1 MANYAR.
Widiastuti, A. S., & Purwanto, J. (2019). Remediasi Miskonsepsi Pada Materi Gelombang Bunyi Dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Metode 5E Di SMA N 1 Turi. Prosiding SNFA (Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Aplikasinya), 4(2000), 25. https://doi.org/10.20961/prosidingsnfa.v4i0.35909
Yip, D. Y. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200406
Yulianty, D., Atmaja, S., & Samsudin, A. (n.d.). Membongkar Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Momentum dan Impuls dengan Rasch Model :Temuan dari Momentum and Impulse Four-Tier Test (MIF-2T) Debunking Students’ Misconceptions on Momentum and Impulse Concepts with the Rasch Model: Findings from the Momentum and Impulse Four-Tier Test (MIF-2T).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Faldi Maliqi, Emiliannur, Festiyed, Hayyu Yumna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Physics Learning and Education is licensed under a 