Development of HOTS Oriented Physics Learning Chapter with CBR Approach on Work & Energy Material
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v1i2.21Keywords:
e-book chapter, HOTS, CBR, effort & energyAbstract
This research focuses on the development of HOTS-oriented physics learning e-book chapters with the CBR approach on effort and energy material for class X SMA which aims to test the validity and practicality of the e-book chapter. By using the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation, this form of research is classified as Research and Development (R&D). The e-book chapter validation test process involved 3 UNP Physics lecturers as validators. In the e-book chapter practicality test to teachers, 2 teachers as practitioners from three schools. The practicality test of the e-book chapter to students was carried out on 9 students from one school. From the results of the research data analysis, the conclusions were obtained, first, the HOTS-oriented physics learning e-book chapter with the CBR approach on the material of effort and energy for class X SMA has a validity value of 0.8 with a very valid category. Second, the results of the practicality test of the HOTS-oriented physics learning chapter e-book with the CBR approach on work and energy material for grade X high school have a practicality value of 89.29 with a very practical category. Furthermore, the results of the practicality of the HOTS-oriented physics learning chapter e-book for students with the CBR approach on work & energy material for class X SMA have a practicality value of 87.79 with a very useful category. The practicality and validity results state that the e-book chapter made can be applied to the learning process.
Downloads
References
D. Pristiwanti, B. Badariah, S. Hidayat, and R. S. Dewi, “Pengertian Pendidikan,” J. Pendidik. Dan Konseling, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1707–1715, 2022.
M. Z. Fanani, “Strategi Pengembangan Soal Hots Pada Kurikulum 2013,” Edudeena, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 57–76, 2018, doi: 10.30762/ed.v2i1.582.
C. dan J. Widodo, Buku Panduan Menyusun Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo., 2008.
A. Budiarti, J. Handhika, and S. Kartikawati, “Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Dengan Pendekatan Scientific Berbasis E-Book Pada Materi Rangkaian Induktor Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Jupiter (Jurnal Pendidik. Tek. Elektro), vol. 2, no. 2, p. 21, 2017, doi: 10.25273/jupiter.v2i2.1795.
Puspendik, Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional. 2019.
R. Heinich, Molenda, Instructional Media and New Technologies of Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
I. Bichindaritz, “Data mining methods for case-based reasoning in health sciences,” CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 1520, pp. 184–198, 2015.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
S. Arikunto, Dasar – Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara., 2015.
Riduwan., Belajar Mudah Penelitian Untuk Guru-Karyawanbdan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung: alfa beta, 2015.
Sukardi, Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2011.
Rochmad, “Desain Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika,” J. KREANO, vol. 3, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dwi Rika Andriyani Rika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Physics Learning and Education is licensed under a 