This is an outdated version published on 2024-07-08. Read the most recent version.

ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA KELAS X SMA DI KOTA PADANG TENTANG MATERI HUKUM NEWTON DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK FOUR-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICE

Authors

  • Amisa Bawamenewi Departemen Fisika Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v2i2.120

Keywords:

Misconception analysis, Newton's laws, four-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test.

Abstract

The importance of students' understanding of concepts is to enhance the learning process and achieve good learning outcomes. However, what often happens is that students struggle to understand the material, make mistakes in applying concepts, and even become frustrated or lose interest in certain subjects. This research aims to describe students' misconceptions through a four-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test on Newton's laws. This study is a qualitative descriptive research using a four-tier multiple-choice test instrument. The research sample includes three public high schools in the city of Padang in the academic year 2023/2024. The sampling technique used is simple random sampling, with 25% of the total number of students in each school participating in the study, totaling 80 students. Based on the analysis, the highest level of understanding of concepts experienced by students is in the subtopic of Newton's Third Law, with an average percentage of 57.3%. Meanwhile, the highest misconceptions experienced by students are in the subtopics of the applications of Newton's Laws I, II, III, with average percentages of 84.6%, 76.3%, and 85%, respectively. Additionally, the highest lack of understanding of concepts is in the subtopic of forces on inclined planes, with a percentage of 40%. Therefore, it can be concluded that in Newton's laws, there are more misconceptions experienced by students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sulastiani, S., Nurhayati, N., & Kauseng, A. (2012). “Analisis Keterampilan Proses melalui Metode Eksperimen dalam Pembelajaran Fisika pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri I Makassar”. Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika, 8(3).

Kamaluddin, H., & Fihrin, H. (2016). “Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Gerak Lurus pada Siswa SMA Negeri di Kota Palu”. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 4(3), 1–3.

Cepni, S., Ulger, B. B., & Ormanci, U. (2017). PreService Science Teachers’ Views Towards the Process of Associating Science Concepts with Everyday Life. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10208.

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989– 1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a.

Samsudin, A., Fratiwi, N., Amin, N., Wiendartun, Supriyatman, Wibowo, F., Faizin, M., & Costu, B. (2018). Improving Students’ Conceptions on Fluid Dynamics Through Peer Teaching Model with PDEODE (PTM-PDEODE). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012040.

Annisa, R., Astuti, B., & Mindyarto, B. N. (2019). Tes Diagnostik Four Tier untuk Identifikasi Pemahaman dan Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Gerak Melingkar Beraturan. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 5(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v5i1.3546.

Fariyani Q, et al. 2015. Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Untuk Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Jurnal Universitas Negeri semarang. Vol. 4. 5No. 2.

Haris, V. 2016. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Mekanika Dengan Menggunakan CRI (Certainty of Response Index). Ta’dib, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v16i1.240

Safriana. S, & Fatmi, N. 2018. Analisis Miskonsepsi Materi Mekanika pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Melalui Force Concept Inventory dan Certainty of5 Response Index. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 6(2), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v6i2.11897.

Suparno Paul. 2013. Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Lestari, D., Handayani, D., & Darussyamsu, R. (2019). Identification Students ’Misconceptions of Class VIII SMPN 21 Padang in the Skeletal Systems of Organism by Using CRI Technique. Atrium Pendidikan Biologi, 4(1), 135–142.

Qurrota, A., & Nuswowati, M. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostic Multiple Choice Berbantuan CRI (Certainty of Response Index). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia.

Sheftyawan, W. B., Prihandono, T., & Lesmono, A. D. (2018). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Four-tier Diagnostic Test pada Materi Optik Geometri. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(2), 147–153.

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. 2014. Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research In Physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 10 (2), 1554-9178.

Imre, Kuczmann. 2013. Students' Misconceptions in Mechanics and their Manifestation in a Survey. Physics Competitions Vol. 15 No 1 & 2 2013.

Puspendik. 2019. Daftar Nilai Wilayah dan Satuan Pendidikan. (https://s.id/GjBaA).

Syahrul, D. A., & Setyarsih, W. (2015). JIPF, 04(03), 67–70.

Sugianto, Fariyani, R. A. 2015. “Pengembangan Four-Tier Dagnostik Test Untuk Mengungkapkan Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X”. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2).

Suryono, Hariyanto. 2011. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Hakim, A. 2012. Student Concept Understanding of Natural Products Chemistry in Primary and Secondary Metabolies Using the Data Collecting Technique of Modified CRI. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 4 (3),544-553.

Juita, Z., Sundari, P. D., Sari, S. Y., & Rahim, F. R. (2023). Identification of physics misconceptions using five-tier diagnostic test: newton’s law of gravitation context. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 5954-5963.

Published

2024-07-08

Versions

How to Cite

Bawamenewi, A. (2024). ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA KELAS X SMA DI KOTA PADANG TENTANG MATERI HUKUM NEWTON DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN TES DIAGNOSTIK FOUR-TIER MULTIPLE CHOICE. Physics Learning and Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v2i2.120