INITIAL ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' SCIENTIFIC LITERACY ON DYNAMICS OF PARTICLE MOTION

Authors

  • Mayang Wahyuni Putri Padang State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v2i4.169

Keywords:

Scientific Literacy, Dynamics of Particle Motion, Plomp model

Abstract

One of the most important abilities in the 21st century is scientific literacy. This research is to analyze students' initial physics science literacy abilities in the dynamics of particle motion. The research method used was descriptive quantitative with a sample of 30 students of class XI phase F.7 at SMAN 2 Solok. Data processing is obtained from two categories, namely student tests and teacher questionnaires. From the results of the student test analysis, the indicator for explaining phenomena scientifically is 61% in the "medium" category, the indicator for interpreting data and scientific evidence is 30% in the "very low" category and the indicator for evaluating and designing scientific investigations is 17% in the category “very low”. The overall average in the category of achievement of students' scientific literacy skills is 36% in the "very low" category. The results of the teacher questionnaire on the aspect of the teacher's use of learning models are 26% in the "Rarely" category, the aspect of identifying students' scientific literacy in the material on the dynamics of particle motion is 44% in the "sometimes" category, the aspect of the use of teaching materials and digital learning media is 26% in the "Rarely" category, aspects of carrying out experiments on the dynamics of particle motion, namely 3% in the "Never" category and aspects of the use of facilities and equipment, namely 21% in the "sometimes" category. Based on these results, it can trigger students' low scientific literacy abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Coppi, “Scientific Literacy and the Science Curriculum Reorganisation in Portugal,” Educ. Real., vol. 48, 2023, doi: 10.1590/2175-6236129450vs02.

M. Andi, “Analysis of science literacy profile based 2015 Pisa framework on final semester assessment questions for class XI SMAN 2 Katingan Kuala, academic year 2019/2020 the topic of hydrocarbon and natural oil compounds,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2621, no. 1. 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0142927.

A. Altun, “Cross-national study on students and school factors affecting science literacy,” Educ. Stud., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 403–421, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2019.1702511.

J. J. B. R. Aruta, “Science literacy promotes energy conservation behaviors in Filipino youth via climate change knowledge efficacy: Evidence from PISA 2018,” Aust. J. Environ. Educ., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 2023, doi: 10.1017/aee.2022.10.

J. Kang, “Interrelationship Between Inquiry-Based Learning and Instructional Quality in Predicting Science Literacy,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 339–355, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11165-020-09946-6.

Supriyadi et al., “Implementation of HOTS-Oriented Problem Based Learning on,” J. Pendidik. Progresif, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1492–1499, 2022, doi: 10.23960/jpp.v12.i3.2022.

OECD, PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2016.

OECD, Pisa 2022 Results The State of Learning and Equity in Education, vol. I. 2023. doi: 10.31244/9783830998488.

A. Hartono, “BIOLOGY STUDENTS’ SCIENCE LITERACY LEVEL ON GENETIC CONCEPTS,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 146–152, 2023, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39941.

OECD, PISA 2012 Assesment and Analitycal Framework Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. 2013. doi: 10.4324/9781003090366.

F. Wulandari, “An Analysis of Teacher Candidates Scientific Literacy through Nature of Science (NoS) in Inquiry-Based Learning,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1764, no. 1. 2021. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012102.

F. Mukharomah, W. Wiyanto, and N. M. Darma Putra, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Fisika Siswa Sma Pada Materi Kinematika Gerak Lurus Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Teach. Learn. Phys., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2021, doi: 10.15575/jotalp.v6i1.10391.

D. Sartika, “The scientific literacy profile of senior high school student based on science competence dimension,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2619. 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0122563.

F. Yusmar and R. E. Fadilah, “Analisis Rendahnya Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Indonesia: Hasil Pisa Dan Faktor Penyebab,” LENSA (Lentera Sains) J. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2023, doi: 10.24929/lensa.v13i1.283.

Sahyar, “Analysis of competency level for wave science in general physics-based on literacy science in pisa,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1485, no. 1. 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1485/1/012012.

N. Shofiyah, R. Wulandari, and E. Setiyawati, “Modul Dinamika Partikel Terintegrasi Permainan Tradisional Berbasis E-Learning untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains,” J. Kependidikan J. Has. Penelit. dan Kaji. Kepustakaan di Bid. Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 292, 2020, doi: 10.33394/jk.v6i2.2639.

Sasdayang, A. Takda, and M. Anas, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik MA Al-Ikhlas Siompu Barat Berdasarkan Instrumen Nature of Science Literacy Test (NOSLiT) dan Scientific Inquiry Literacy Test (ScInqLIT),” J. Penelit. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 249–263, 2022, doi: 10.36709/jipfi.v7i4.40.

I. N. Vlasova, “Training teachers in the design of experimental tasks for the development of students’ science literacy,” Perspekt. Nauk. i Obraz., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 620–642, 2022, doi: 10.32744/pse.2022.1.40.

D. Lestari and W. Setyarsih, “Kelayakan Instrumen Penilaian Formatif Berbasis Literasi Sains Peserta Didik pada Materi Pemanasan Global,” IPF Inov. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 561–570, 2020, doi: 10.26740/ipf.v9n3.p561-570.

Saparini, “Science Literacy Skills for Srijaya Negara Junior High School Students in Palembang,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 3052, no. 1. 2024. doi: 10.1063/5.0201011.

D. R. Rizaldi, A. W. Jufri, and J. Jamaluddin, “PhET: SIMULASI INTERAKTIF DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA,” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 2020, doi: 10.29303/jipp.v5i1.103.

A. A. Puspaningtyas, “Analysis on readability of scientific literacy enrichment book on earth science concept,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1521, no. 4. 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042103.

OECD, PISA 2018 Results What Students Know and Can Do, vol. I. 2019. doi: 10.1787/5f07c754-en.

Q. Guo, “The Mechanism of Influence Between ICT and Students’ Science Literacy: a Hierarchical and Structural Equation Modelling Study,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 272–288, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10956-021-09954-9.

N. Rohmaya, “Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Socioscientific Issues (SSI),” J. Pendidik. Mipa, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 107–117, 2022, doi: 10.37630/jpm.v12i2.553.

A. Putra, “Rancang Bangun Media Pembelajaran Interaktif IPA Berbasis Aplikasi Adobe Flash Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” J. Literasi Digit., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–35, 2022, doi: 10.54065/jld.2.1.2022.116.

F. A. Putri and F. Mufit, “Efektivitas Penerapan Multimedia Interaktif Dalam Penilaian Keterampilan 4C Pada Pembelajaran Fisika: Studi Literature,” EduFisika J. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 253–260, 2023, doi: 10.59052/edufisika.v8i2.25702.

A. V Getman, “Students’ science motivation: A cross-country analysis of the relationship with the science literacy level,” Psychol. Sci. Educ., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 77–87, 2021, doi: 10.17759/PSE.2020250607.

M. S. Gunawan and F. Mufit, “Design and Validity of an E-Assessment Four Tier Multiple Choice To Assess Science Literacy Skills of Senior High School Students,” Phys. Learn. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 28–38, 2024, doi: 10.24036/ple.v2i1.97.

H. Fuadi, A. Z. Robbia, J. Jamaluddin, and A. W. Jufri, “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik,” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 108–116, 2020, doi: 10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-07

How to Cite

Putri, M. W. (2025). INITIAL ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC LITERACY ON DYNAMICS OF PARTICLE MOTION. Physics Learning and Education, 2(4), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v2i4.169