INITIAL ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS SCIENCE LITERACY ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY MATERIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v2i4.166Keywords:
Science Litercy, Alternative EnergyAbstract
Scientific literacy is one of the skills that symbolizes expanding knowledge and resolving issues. PISA 2018 findings, however, show that scientific literacy in Indonesia is still very poor. Aspects of students' scientific literacy, including their capacity to evaluate and plan scientific research, interpret data and scientific evidence, and explain occurrences scientifically, will be examined in this study. Analyzing students' scientific literacy in alternative energy content was the aim of this study.. The method used is quantitative descriptive using a scientific literacy test instrument in the form of questions for students and questionnaires for teachers on alternative energy material used to collect data. Twenty-five students and two physics professors made up the research sample. The findings of the examination of two instructors' learning implementation were 60.48%. The average overall competency domain indicator was 47.80% with a very low category, based on students' mastery of scientific literacy in the competency domain indicator explaining scientific phenomena (51.42% with a low category), evaluating and designing scientific investigations (68% with a moderate category), and interpreting data and scientific evidence (24% with a very low category). Thus, it can be said that pupils' scientific literacy regarding alternative energy content is still rather low.
Downloads
References
I. Lestari, O. B.K Gultom, and F. Saputri Zebua, “Penerapan Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Di Era Society 5.0,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Sains dan Terap. (INTERN ), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 92–98, 2022, doi: 10.58466/intern.v1i2.1449.
A. T. Kinslow, T. D. Sadler, and H. T. Nguyen, “Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 388–410, 2019.
H. M. Dirman and F. Mufit, “Analisis Penggunaan Instrument Penilaian Pemahaman Konsep dan Literasi Sains di SMA Kabupaten Solok,” J. Penelit. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 251–256, 2022, doi: 10.26877/jp2f.v13i2.12923.
T. Turrini, D. Dörler, A. Richter, F. Heigl, and A. Bonn, “The threefold potential of environmental citizen science-Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 225, pp. 176–186, 2018.
H. Fuadi, A. Z. Robbia, and A. W. Jufri, “Analisis faktor penyebab rendahnya kemampuan literasi sains peserta didik,” vol. 5, pp. 108–116, 2020.
J.-X. Yao and Y.-Y. Guo, “Core competences and scientific literacy: The recent reform of the school science curriculum in China,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 40, no. 15, pp. 1913–1933, 2018.
P. D. Hurd, “Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world,” Sci. Educ., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 407–416, 1998.
S. N. Pratiwi, C. Cari, and N. S. Aminah, “Pembelajaran IPA abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa,” J. Mater. dan Pembelajaran …, vol. 9, pp. 34–42, 2019.
J. Sjöström and I. Eilks, “Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung,” Cogn. metacognition, Cult. STEM Educ. Learn. Teach. Assess., pp. 65–88, 2018.
OECD, PISA 2018 Results (Volume I), vol. I. 2019. doi: 10.1787/5f07c754-en.
C.-T. Wen et al., “Students’ guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy,” Comput. Educ., vol. 149, p. 103830, 2020.
N. Sutrisna, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMA Di Kota Sungai Penuh,” vol. 1, no. 12, 2021.
F. A. Putri and F. Mufit, “Analysis of Students’ Scientific Literacy on Work and Energy as Well as Momentum and Impulse,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 10583–10589, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5990.
A. Lai, C. Chen, and G. Lee, “An augmented reality‐based learning approach to enhancing students’ science reading performances from the perspective of the cognitive load theory,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 232–247, 2019.
M. Novita, A. Rusilowati, S. Susilo, and ..., “Meta-analisis literasi sains siswa di Indonesia,” UPEJ Unnes Phys. …, vol. 10, no. 3, 2021.
C. Greenhow, T. Gibbins, and M. M. Menzer, “Re-thinking scientific literacy out-of-school: Arguing science issues in a niche Facebook application,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 53, pp. 593–604, 2015.
S. Paek and L. Fulton, “Digital science notebooks: A tool for supporting scientific literacy at the elementary level,” TechTrends, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 359–370, 2021.
U. D. Pertiwi, R. D. Atanti, and R. Ismawati, “Pentingnya Literasi Sains Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Smp Abad 21,” Indones. J. Nat. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2018, doi: 10.31002/nse.v1i1.173.
K. Akbar and L. Kamarudin, “Information and Communication Technology Based Learning in the 21st Century,” in 5th Asian Education Symposium 2020 (AES 2020), Atlantis Press, 2021, pp. 135–139.
A. Latip and A. Faisal, “Upaya Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa melalui Media Pembelajaran IPA BerbasisLatip, A., & Faisal, A. (2021). Upaya Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa melalui Media Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Komputer. Jurnal Pendidikan UNIGA, 15(1), 444. https://doi.org/10.,” J. Pendidik. UNIGA, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 444–452, 2021.
L. Yore, G. L. Bisanz, and B. M. Hand, “Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 689–725, 2003.
C. Qiao, Y. Chen, Q. Guo, and Y. Yu, “Understanding science data literacy: a conceptual framework and assessment tool for college students majoring in STEM,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 25, 2024.
M. Dhanil and F. Mufit, “Preliminary Analysis of Scientific Literacy in Fluids at SHS 6 Padang,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 9257–9262, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4320.
F. Mukharomah, W. Wiyanto, and N. M. Darma Putra, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Fisika Siswa Sma Pada Materi Kinematika Gerak Lurus Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Teach. Learn. Phys., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2021, doi: 10.15575/jotalp.v6i1.10391.
L. Ke, T. D. Sadler, L. Zangori, and P. J. Friedrichsen, “Developing and using multiple models to promote scientific literacy in the context of socio-scientific issues,” Sci. Educ., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 589–607, 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 anisya rahmadani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Physics Learning and Education is licensed under a 